Johannes Maria Staud: Maniai

Johannes Maria Staud Maniai
Maniai

Johannes Maria Staud: Maniai

Year of composition:
2011
Scored for:
for orchestra
Composer:
Johannes Maria Staud
Instrumentation:
3 3 3 3 - 4 3 3 1 - perc(4), str
Instrumentation details:
1st flute
2nd flute
3rd flute (+picc)
1st oboe
2nd oboe
3rd oboe (+c.a)
1st clarinet in Bb
2nd clarinet in Bb (+cl(Eb))
3rd clarinet in Bb (+bass cl(Bb))
1st bassoon
2nd bassoon
contrabassoon
1st horn in F
2nd horn in F
3rd horn in F
4th horn in F
1st trumpet in Bb
2nd trumpet in Bb
3rd trumpet in Bb (+picc.tpt in (hoch)B )
1st trombone
2nd trombone
3rd trombone
tuba
1st percussion
2nd percussion
3rd percussion
4th percussion
violin I
violin II
viola
violoncello
double bass
Commission:
Kompositionsauftrag des Symphonieorchesters des Bayerischen Rundfunks
Duration:
10’15”
Dedication:
für Mariss Jansons
More Less

Audiosamples

Maniai
00:00

The complete perusal score (PDF-preview)

Work introduction

Interview with the composer by Sibylle Kayser

Mr. Staud, your composition was commissioned by the Bavarian Radio; it will be played right after Beethoven’s First Symphony. So you are continuing a series of new compositions all created in association with a performance of a Beethoven symphony. How did you decide upon the First?

It’s probably the piece that made me become a composer in the first place; I heard it when I was seven or eight. The orchestration is absolutely terrific, the dynamic energy and coherence are incredible. The final movement fascinated me especially when I was doing this work – such unbridled, impulsive, rousing music, developing so cogently and excitingly from the initially hesitant ascending motion. The way Beethoven concentrates on so few motifs, clashes them constantly together at the fastest tempo to achieve such an incredible undertow – it’s fascinating every time.

I imagined how my piece would sound after the fourth movement of the First. The audience still has that music in their heads, and then it begins; with me, Beethoven’s ascending cascades are turned downwards, with descending scales not in octaves in the strings and winds, while the brass counter with motivically loaded counterparts surging upwards. The scales are comprised of two or three semitones separated by a minor third. This results in music which does not quote Beethoven (that wouldn’t be a favour to Beethoven or the audience), but which is inspired by his pattern of motion and spins it out.

I chose a fast tempo as the basic one and I left the matter of subdivision very simple; I mean, there are long passages of just quavers or quaver triplets in frenzied tempo. I took that from Beethoven. Even in fast tempos, I often used to choose a slow basic beat with many beamed notes, which actually contradicts fast music in the classic sense. This time, although the rhythmic variety is relatively limited, the result is actually a very targeted impulse in a fast tempo.

The name Maniai is Greek; it refers to the three Furies. What prompted you to choose that title?

The title came to me more or less in the middle of my work on the piece. In Old Greek, the Furies are actually called the Erinnyes together, individually Alecto, Megaera and Tisiphone. Their origin is in a pre-Christian time when it was the Furies’ task to avenge unpunished murders and capital crimes – that is, to persecute the criminals incessantly, to drive them mad and ultimately to induce their suicide. For instance, Alecto scourges a criminal’s thought, mercilessly wearing down his psyche, before handing him over to her two “colleagues.” But the most striking thing is this; in Greek mythology, the Furies occasionally transform into the three Graces – sometimes dressed in black, sometimes in white. But we are never entirely sure whether they are actually identical – and it was that ambiguity which fascinated me; avenging goddesses can also be goddesses of forgiveness – which was the case with Orestes, for example.

I was looking for a title to match the character of my composition. It was already certain that it would last about 10 minutes. I had already written several works for orchestra, but I’d never held the tempo pedal down for so long – almost seven minutes, about 2/3 of the piece. The music never allows you any calm – it pursues you relentlessly, like the Erinnyes.

Besides, "Maniai" sounds so mysterious and archaic; “mania” and “manic” stem from it. Italian “furioso” is therefore the agogic marking for the first part. I gave “grazioso” to the second half; the Furies have apparently transformed into the Graces – but we don’t know for sure …

To return to the musical construction: you mentioned that you work with scales. But it is worthwhile to describe them in more detail; you also use microtones – in what form?

There is a microtonal web over the entire piece; that is, I am working with the “normal” stock of pitches, but I detune 12 of them a quarter-tone lower over the entire gamut. Gérard Grisey did much the same thing in his Vortex Temporum, tuning four pitches a quarter-tone down. What intrigued me was how the harmonic colour changes when constantly shifting the scale entries and their modulation, yielding up continuously new, microtonally shaded mixtures. I also confronted anew the idea of harmonic rhythm, of which Beethoven was an unsurpassable master. Because I juxtapose the scales closely and polyphonically – it is not for nothing that all the strings are subdivided into at least two voices, and sometimes even three or four – an iridescent sonic shimmer results – and I find that enormously exciting combined with heavy concentrations of sound. The more voices I have, the tighter I can weave my sonic web.

Subdividing the strings (16 of them), tripling the winds and quadrupling the horns gives you over 30 voices. Do you consider all of them equal?

Indubitably. They allow me more options for combination – and not only harmonically; I am also talking about Klangfarbe. For instance, I can have the first trumpet accompany the clarinets and let the second trumpet play together with the bassoons, all at the same time. Besides, I need a lot of parts because the melodic voices countering the frenzied scales keep entering in mixtures of three to six voices, sometimes even with antiphonal additions.

Maniai is in two parts – the first, somewhat longer part, is very fast, while the second part is slow. Yet short slow passages keep interrupting the rapid initial part. Can you tell us something about those musical hiatuses?

Everything in the piece intermingles and interweaves; everything is interrelated. The calm moments in the first part anticipate the second one, while also integrally comprising an extremely rigorous proportioning of time. The first section starts with about 60 seconds of rapidity; then come 15 seconds of slow music, followed by 45 seconds fast, then 30 seconds of calm, which then devolves to the initial impulse, again anticipating the two large, weighty tutti hammering at the end of the first part – it is all worked out, even the minutest details. In addition, rhythmic and melodic material often switch places from background to foreground in the course of the piece – again, Beethoven was my model, with his extremely economical use of motivic-thematic material.

Regarding the orchestration as well? Near the end of the piece an oboe line comes to the fore, played by the oboe, cor anglais and musette. Could that be a musical personification of the three Furies/Graces?

I have always felt that one of the most beautiful moments in Beethoven’s First is in the second theme-group of the first movement, where the high oboe hovers over the low, descending strings – its melody is at once incisive and plaintive. It has something mysterious, incredibly moving about it. I use three members of the oboe family in Maniai – oboe, cor anglais and high musette – also known as “piccolo oboe.” Of course these three instruments – which have prominent solos especially in the final section – could be considered as something like personifications of the three Furies. The emphasis is on “could” since, thank goodness, composing is too abstract to carry such analogies too far.

Your love and knowledge of Beethoven’s works is evident. But I would still be interested in how you reacted when you got the commission, including stipulations, for [Maniai] – very free, because you were merely supposed to deal with Beethoven’s First Symphony – yet that was a stipulation.

If the stipulation had been to continue working with Beethoven’s given material, to quote him in my piece, I could not have accepted the commission. But “take Beethoven 1” was a wonderful stimulus for me. That did not curtail my artistic freedom at all – quite the contrary. Often it is just such an impulse which gives rise to a certain work – for instance, I wrote a cello concerto for the Salzburg Festival based on a sketch Mozart made for a cello-piano sonata. Now, for my latest work, I have taken Beethoven as a model to the extent that I have always been fascinated by his ability to have absolute gentleness co-exist with absolute savagery, to retain abruptness undisguised – indeed, to bring it into chiselled prominence – without disturbing the formal coherence.

Did the performance situation influence your work?

There are two kinds of commissions – those involving contemporary music and the so-called “sandwich concerts,” where new pieces are placed between familiar orchestral works of the Classical and Romantic periods. The old and the new are much more separated in the fine arts. In music, we are confronted with history, much more often, due to programming alone. For me, the work on Maniai also meant looking very closely again at an old, very familiar masterpiece – Beethoven 1, in this case – and tapping into its qualities. For the audience, it’s also a chance to have a morsel of contemporary music served up to them within a familiar framework. And of course there are always people –many more than one thinks – who are caught up by the new music at such a concert.

Last year, you were in Dresden, a “Capell-Compositeur.” That sounds rather antiquated, suggesting a composer’s dependence, in a certain way, on institutions. How do you view the situation of a freelance composer nowadays?

If you want to earn your living from composing, you have to accept commissions – that’s no different today from how it was back then. Prestigious commissions are intriguing from several viewpoints. Apart from the chance to work with great performers, artistic personalities, in optimal conditions, they also give me the opportunity to attend to smaller pieces, commissioned work, afterwards – some of which take much more time than they’re financially worth. But if I have discovered a lot for myself in a piece for solo bassoon, for instance, things that advance me as a composer, then that is also beneficial for the larger works.

Do you think a commissioned work needs to be emancipated from the conditions of a first performance?

Of course. A piece written for a certain occasion – the occasion is inspiring, too, but the piece must survive that occasion and work elsewhere as well. That also applies to the performers at the premiere. If I write for a particular soloist, it still has to be comprehensible to other musicians – but without that occasion, the piece would probably never have been written.

And the piece could gain a richer inner life in other performances by other soloists – everyone reads a piece differently …

When I hear and see how Mahler’s symphonies are performed today, for example, and compare them with recordings 30, 40 years old, I must say that Mahler is played much better today. But that, too, has grown over the decades. Sometimes a mistake sneaks into an interpretation and there it stays for years on end; that’s why there is no one single interpretation of Beethoven or Mozart – and that’s good. You can’t compare the readings of Nikolaus Harnoncourt, Marc Minowski, Simon Rattle and Mariss Jansons – and it’s not only the conductors who are different – the orchestral character is never the same. To this day, the Vienna Philharmonic still sounds entirely different from the Berlin Philharmonic - and the Bavarian Radio Symphony.

And you had the “sound” of the Bavarian Radio Symphony in mind?

After some absolutely fine experiences a couple of years ago, I was especially counting on their familiarity with contemporary music, their virtuosity, the homogeneity of their groups and their finely balanced sonority. Maybe that’s why Maniai is a very difficult piece.

Apropos Mariss Jansons: I heard him recently in Vienna, conducting Beethoven’s Third Piano Concerto. It is simply incredible how he can mould quiet moments, how he never loses sight of the overall architecture, how finely calibrated he and his orchestra can shape developmental arcs and escalations. All that naturally influenced me while I was working on the piece; it was always in the back of my mind – it is also a deep obeisance to Beethoven’s dynamic.

Thus here, as well: multilayered correlations.

Special prints

Maniai

Johannes Maria Staud: Maniai

study score
for orchestra , 10’15”
Instr.: 3 3 3 3 - 4 3 3 1 - perc(4), str

Maniai

Johannes Maria Staud: Maniai

study score
for orchestra , 10’15”
Instr.: 3 3 3 3 - 4 3 3 1 - perc(4), str

World première

Location:
München
Date:
09.02.2012
Orchestra:
SO des Bayerischen Rundfunks
Conductor:
Mariss Jansons

Other works

Sign up for our newsletter!

You will regularly receive information about new scores with free downloads, current prize games and news about our composers.